Ngāti Mutunga (Taranaki)

Ngāti Mutunga and the Crown signed a Deed of Settlement on 31 July 2005.

In this section

Ngāti Mutunga Deed of Settlement documents

Ngāti Mutunga Deed of Settlement summary

 

 

 

Ngāti Mutunga (Taranaki) Deed of Settlement documents

 

Deed of Settlement documents

File Date Size
Nohoanga Entitlement (Uruti Domain) [PDF, 684 KB] 20 Dec 2006 680 KB
Deed Granting a Right of First Refusal over property [PDF, 613 KB] 13 Dec 2006 609 KB
Deed of Covenant (Okoki Pa) [PDF, 397 KB] 13 Dec 2006 393 KB
Deed of Recognition (Rivers) [PDF, 220 KB] 13 Dec 2006 216 KB
Deed of Recognition (MoC) [PDF, 1.9 MB] 13 Dec 2006 1.9 MB
Deed Granting a Right of First Refusal over Shellfish Quota [PDF, 385 KB] 13 Dec 2006 381 KB
Deed of Covenant (Pukemiro site) [PDF, 391 KB] 13 Dec 2006 386 KB
Deed of Covenant (Te Urenui Pa) [PDF, 416 KB] 13 Dec 2006 412 KB
Deed of Covenant (Urenui site) [PDF, 435 KB] 13 Dec 2006 430 KB
Deed of Covenant [PDF, 89 KB] 3 Feb 2006 85 KB
Heads of Agreement [PDF, 2.4 MB] 24 Sep 1999 2.4 MB

 

Ngāti Mutunga (Taranaki) Deed of Settlement summary

Overview

The Ngāti Mutunga Deed of Settlement is the final settlement of all Ngāti Mutunga’s historical claims in Taranaki resulting from acts or omissions by the Crown prior to 21 September 1992 and is made up of a package that includes:

  • an agreed historical account and Crown acknowledgements, which form the basis for a Crown Apology to Ngāti Mutunga;
  • cultural redress; and
  • financial and commercial redress.

No private land is involved in the redress, only Crown assets. The benefits of the settlement will be available to all members of Ngāti Mutunga, wherever they live.

Background

Ngāti Mutunga is one of eight generally recognised iwi of Taranaki. Mutunga is acknowledged by Ngāti Mutunga as the paramount and principal identifying ancestor from which ngā uri o ngā tūpuna o Ngāti Mutunga can trace descent. Ngāti Mutunga is located in northern Taranaki and has approximately 1300 members.

Redress

Crown apology

The Crown apologises to Ngāti Mutunga for past dealings that breached the Crown’s obligations under the Treaty of Waitangi. These include the Taranaki wars, the confiscation of land, and the cumulative effects of these events, which have had a devastating effect on the welfare, economy, and social and economic development of Ngāti Mutunga in Taranaki.

Questions and answers

What is the cost to the Crown?

$14.9 million plus interest from the date of the signing of the Deed of Settlement, and the cost of cultural sites returned, as listed in Redress under "Sites transferred to Ngāti Mutunga".

Is there any private land involved?

No.

Are the public’s rights affected?

Generally no, but:

  • The camping entitlement or nohoanga is the same as camping entitlements granted in other Treaty settlements. Ngāti Mutunga will have the exclusive use of one site of 0.7 hectares for up to 210 days per year. This entitlement does not affect public access to waterways.
  • The symbolic transfer of the Onaero Domain and Urenui Domain Reserves to Ngäti Mutunga will preserve public access and all the rights of the existing private leaseholders on those reserves. The New Plymouth District Council will continue to administer the reserves.

What is a Statutory Acknowledgement?

These acknowledge areas or sites with which claimant groups have a special relationship and will be recognised in any proceedings under the Resource Management Act. This provision aims to avoid past problems with land development for roading and other purposes when areas of significance to Māori, such as burial grounds, were simply cleared or excavated without either permission or consultation. It is not a specific property right.

Are any place names changed?

The name of “Te Urinui Pā” will be corrected to “Te Urenui Pā”, and the name of “Titoki Ridge” will be assigned to a previously unnamed ridge.

What about Mt Taranaki?

Because of the significance of the mountain to all iwi of Taranaki, the question of an apology and redress for the unjust confiscation of the mountain and any other breaches is to be deferred until all iwi are in a position to negotiate. Redress in relation to the mountain will consist of an apology and cultural redress. No further financial or commercial redress will be involved.

Are any National Parks affected by the settlement?

No.

What happens to memorials on private titles?

The settlement will allow for the removal by legislation of the legislative restrictions (memorials) placed on the title of Crown properties and some former Crown properties now in private ownership.

Does the settlement create any special rights for Ngāti Mutunga?

No new rights are being created. Provisions in relation to conservation, such as Statutory Acknowledgements and nohoanga give practical effect to existing provisions of both the Resource Management Act and the Conservation Act that provide for Māori participation in conservation and planning matters.

Does Ngāti Mutunga have the right to come back and make further claims about the behaviour of the Crown in the 19th and 20th centuries in Taranaki?

No. Both parties agree that the Deed of Settlement is fair in the circumstances and will be a final settlement for all Ngāti Mutunga’s historical or pre-1992 claims in Taranaki. The settlement legislation, once passed, will prevent Ngāti Mutunga from re-litigating their Taranaki claims before the Waitangi Tribunal or the courts. The settlement does not include Ngāti Mutunga claims to areas outside of Taranaki. The settlement package will still allow Ngāti Mutunga or members of Ngāti Mutunga to pursue claims against the Crown for acts or omissions after 21 September 1992, including claims based on the continued existence of aboriginal title or customary rights. The Crown also retains the right to dispute such claims or the existence of such title rights.

Will Ngāti Mutunga gain any rights to the foreshore and seabed under the settlement?

No. The existence of aboriginal title or customary rights is not affected by the Deed of Settlement. The Deed of Settlement does not affect the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004.

What about the Taranaki Claims Settlement Act of 1944? Wasn’t that final?

The settlement of 1944 was made unilaterally, without agreement with Ngāti Mutunga. The iwi of Taranaki have never regarded the 1944 Act as adequate redress for Treaty breaches. The Crown also accepts that compensation under the Act was inadequate.

Who benefits from the settlement?

All members of Ngāti Mutunga, wherever they may now live.